Renters lack protection provision

Published on

Research from Scottish Widows indicates that while 30% of private renters admitting that they’d not be financially secure if their household lost its main income, just 16% have life cover in place and only 3% have critical illness insurance.

This is despite the fact that 56% have children under the age of 16 who rely on them financially.

35% concede that if they or their partner were unable to work for six months or longer due to ill health or personal injury, they’d be unable to live on a single income. And when reviewing their finances, 35% pay little or no attention to insuring their rent.

There is more than double the share of families in the private rented sector today than in 1992, yet renters are at much higher financial risk than mortgage-holders, 50% of whom have life cover in place and 20% have critical illness insurance.

Johnny Timpson, Scottish Widows’ protection specialist, said: “Renters are not prompted by a house purchase to look at how they and their families would manage financially if they were to die or become seriously ill. But while they don’t have a mortgage to pay, they still have financial obligations, not least the monthly rent and regular household bills.

“Many renters assume they can rely on benefits, but welfare reform means that fewer of them would get their rent paid in full if their circumstances changed without warning.

“Having a financial plan in place will help protect their living arrangements in this type of eventuality and give greater peace of mind about avoiding eviction and being able to keep up with their regular outgoings.”

80% of renters view a mobile phone as essential yet only 28% think the same about providing security for their dependents in case they die, and just 21% think that providing security for their family should they become seriously ill is a necessity.

30% of private renters say that they’d use savings to manage financially if their household lost its main income, yet 20% have less than £1,000 put aside and 30% have no savings at all. 36% could only afford to pay household bills for a maximum of five months if they or their partner were unable to work, and 13% say they wouldn’t be able to pay anything at all.

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

Latest articles

Millions of households exposed to financial shocks despite apparent stability

Millions of UK households that appear financially secure could struggle to absorb an unexpected...

The Mortgage Hut adopts Instamo tool to speed up mortgage applications

The Mortgage Hut has introduced Instamo's FastSubmit technology to reduce the amount of manual...

FCA sets out timetable for major expansion of anti-money laundering supervision

The FCA expects to begin taking over anti-money laundering supervision of legal, accountancy and...

MAB revenue rises as refinancing drives mortgage completions

Mortgage Advice Bureau reported an 8.6% increase in first-half revenue to £161.0m as higher...

FCA warns consumers over pressure tactics in debt advice market

The Financial Conduct Authority has warned consumers to be alert to firms using pressure...

Latest publication

Other news

Harpenden’s expat move could be bigger than the numbers suggest

Harpenden Building Society’s move into expat mortgages this summer has been good news for...

Millions of households exposed to financial shocks despite apparent stability

Millions of UK households that appear financially secure could struggle to absorb an unexpected...

The Mortgage Hut adopts Instamo tool to speed up mortgage applications

The Mortgage Hut has introduced Instamo's FastSubmit technology to reduce the amount of manual...