Regulator fines insurance director over AR failings

Published on

The FSA has fined Richard Holmes, a director of insurance broker AIF Limited, £20,020 for control failings in relation to an appointed representative firm (AR).

In September 2006, Holmes appointed an AR without carrying out the necessary checks, using only assurances from two business contacts. These individuals were subsequently banned by the FSA on 2 November 2006.

The following February, an insurance underwriter advised Holmes that the AR had premiums outstanding and rather than checking further, he relied on assurances from the AR that the premiums had been brought up to date. Again, when the AR appeared to have problems paying insurance premiums promptly to AIF, Holmes failed to increase his monitoring in any way and nor did he investigate the way the AR was carrying out its business.

Finally, following a complaint made by a client of the AR in September 2007, regarding its failure to put insurance in place, Holmes terminated the AR’s status.

Holmes subsequently became aware that the AR had received clients’ premiums but failed to pass them on to the underwriter, leaving the clients uninsured. In addition, the AR had also instructed AIF to arrange insurance policies on behalf of clients but had failed to pass on the client premiums to AIF.

The FSA is satisfied that Holmes then ensured that AIF took steps to arrange alternative insurance for the clients who had been left uninsured and also ensured that cover was maintained where AIF had already provided instructions to the insurer. The cost to AIF of ensuring clients remained on cover was approximately £27,000.

The FSA took into account that Holmes did not deliberately set out to contravene its requirements co-operated with the FSA and took remedial action to ensure clients were not left uninsured.

Holmes agreed to settle at an early stage of the FSA’s inquires and therefore qualified for a 30% discount under the FSA’s executive settlement procedures. Without the discount the fine would have been £28,600.

Jonathan Phelan, head of retail enforcement, said: “Senior management at firms are responsible for the standards and conduct of the businesses they run – this applies to all firms both large and small. In particular

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

Latest articles

Millions of households exposed to financial shocks despite apparent stability

Millions of UK households that appear financially secure could struggle to absorb an unexpected...

The Mortgage Hut adopts Instamo tool to speed up mortgage applications

The Mortgage Hut has introduced Instamo's FastSubmit technology to reduce the amount of manual...

FCA sets out timetable for major expansion of anti-money laundering supervision

The FCA expects to begin taking over anti-money laundering supervision of legal, accountancy and...

MAB revenue rises as refinancing drives mortgage completions

Mortgage Advice Bureau reported an 8.6% increase in first-half revenue to £161.0m as higher...

FCA warns consumers over pressure tactics in debt advice market

The Financial Conduct Authority has warned consumers to be alert to firms using pressure...

Latest publication

Other news

Harpenden’s expat move could be bigger than the numbers suggest

Harpenden Building Society’s move into expat mortgages this summer has been good news for...

Millions of households exposed to financial shocks despite apparent stability

Millions of UK households that appear financially secure could struggle to absorb an unexpected...

The Mortgage Hut adopts Instamo tool to speed up mortgage applications

The Mortgage Hut has introduced Instamo's FastSubmit technology to reduce the amount of manual...