Claims firms slammed following investigation

Published on

Misleading advice, unfair contract terms and a lack of transparency about fees are commonplace among claims management firms, according to Which? following its undercover investigation of claims management companies.

Which? and MoneySavingExpert.com are joining forces to call on claims management companies to clean up their act and stop misleading consumers.

Posing as someone who thought they might have been mis-sold payment protection insurance (PPI), Which? mystery shopped 25 claims management companies. Which? says most of the companies called didn’t follow the rules set out by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), and Which? identified problems with every company investigated.

Two thirds failed to advise the caller about the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), despite being required to do so. One said ‘if the bank rejects your claim, there’s nothing you can do’.

Six repeatedly told the caller they had more chance of success or would receive more compensation using a CMC than by submitting a claim independently. Which? says that WeFightAnyClaim, for example, told the caller ‘you have over a 90% chance of claiming it through us, or under a 10% chance of doing it by yourself’. Claims management companies are prohibited from making such claims.

Three of the firms – Aims Review, WeFightAnyClaim and Tucan Claims – charge upfront fees, and some asked callers for payment over the phone. In a separate survey, half of people who have used a CMC told Which? they were cold called.

Which? also found contract terms that were unfair. The typical fee charged by a CMC is 30% of the compensation received (25% plus VAT), but the definition of ‘compensation’ varies. Consumers might assume that the fee would be calculated based on the lump sum of money paid to them, but some firms include a reduction in future loan repayments as part of the compensation. As a result, some people could receive far less than they expect, and in some cases even end up owing the CMC money.

Richard Lloyd, executive director of Which?, said: “Claims management companies must clean up their act. All too often

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

Latest articles

ModaMortgages trims limited-edition five-year fixed rates

ModaMortgages has reduced rates by up to 10 basis points across its limited-edition five-year...

Providence agrees deal to acquire Hometrack

Providence Equity Partners has agreed to acquire Hometrack, the residential property valuation and risk...

The Coventry cuts fixed rates by up to 20bps

Coventry for intermediaries has reduced every fixed-rate mortgage in its range, with lower rates...

Family BS appoints Kirsty Dancer as Midlands BDM

Family Building Society has appointed Kirsty Dancer as business development manager for the East...

Atom bank cuts Prime and Near Prime mortgage rates

Atom bank has reduced rates across its Prime and Near Prime mortgage ranges. All Prime...

Latest publication

Other news

ModaMortgages trims limited-edition five-year fixed rates

ModaMortgages has reduced rates by up to 10 basis points across its limited-edition five-year...

Providence agrees deal to acquire Hometrack

Providence Equity Partners has agreed to acquire Hometrack, the residential property valuation and risk...

The Coventry cuts fixed rates by up to 20bps

Coventry for intermediaries has reduced every fixed-rate mortgage in its range, with lower rates...