The Leeds lowers income threshold to widen mortgage access

Published on

Leeds Building Society has sought to ease the path to home ownership for lower earners by reducing the minimum household income needed to access higher loan-to-income mortgages.

Applicants earning £30,000 per year – whether as single or joint households – can now be considered for residential mortgages at or above 4.5 times their annual income, following regulatory approval granted to the lender by the Bank of England. The previous threshold stood at £40,000.

The decision means that a household on £30,000 a year could now borrow up to £165,000 with a 95% loan to value Income Plus mortgage, provided they meet affordability criteria. This would bring homes priced up to £173,000 within reach, up from a previous ceiling of £141,000.

Leeds Building Society’s Income Plus range is aimed at helping first-time buyers onto the property ladder, and the changes apply across all residential lending, including low-deposit mortgages.

The Society said the move would broaden access to the housing market for many creditworthy borrowers who may have previously been constrained by income limits.

The announcement comes as the Prudential Regulation Authority recently amended its lending guidance, allowing individual lenders to exceed the industry-wide cap that restricts the proportion of loans above 4.5 times income to 15% of new business.

The adjustment followed representations from purpose-led lenders such as Leeds, who argued that the cap limited their ability to support younger and lower-income buyers.

In tandem with the income change, the Society has reduced its stress rate, further increasing its capacity to lend. This is part of a broader set of measures designed to aid first-time buyers, including Reach Mortgages for those with weaker credit profiles, a partnership with Experian Boost to help applicants improve their credit scores via open banking data, and its Home Deposit Saver product to support saving for deposits.

Matt Bartle, director of mortgages and savings at Leeds Building Society, said: “We welcomed the decision to consider allowing more high loan-to-income on a lender-by-lender basis and are very pleased to have gained the Bank of England’s permission.

“Lowering our minimum income requirements brings the dream of homeownership a step closer for more borrowers, including many earning below national average earnings.

“We understand the importance of being a prudent and responsible lender. We carry out detailed affordability checks to make sure borrowers can realistically afford repayments and not over-extend themselves financially.”

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

Latest articles

Millions unclear on cost of credit as gaps in financial understanding persist

Millions of UK adults are using credit without fully understanding borrowing costs or how...

UK house price growth slows as London slips into decline

HM Land Registry’s latest UK House Price Index shows the average property price across...

FCA to extend conduct rules to cover bullying and harassment

Mortgage brokers, lenders and other regulated firms will have to tighten their internal conduct...

Solar and heat pump rules could push up mortgage prices

New rules forcing developers to install solar panels and low-carbon heating systems on most...

Keystone launches two-year tracker range as brokers seek flexibility in volatile market

Keystone Property Finance has launched a new range of two-year tracker products for brokers,...

Latest publication

Other news

Millions unclear on cost of credit as gaps in financial understanding persist

Millions of UK adults are using credit without fully understanding borrowing costs or how...

Supply side continues to drive the change agenda

Regulatory change is no longer something firms respond to periodically. It is now a...

Searching for sunny uplands

There is a growing sense, shared quietly in boardrooms and rather less quietly over...