90% of homebuyers are calling for compulsory regulation of estate agents to better protect buyers, according to a new RICS survey.
Of those who failed to check whether their agent was a regulated member of a professional body, 54% said they trusted them to provide honest and truthful advice.
RICS commissioned an online consumer survey of over 1,000 adults from across the UK via ComRes. Respondents had either bought a property, or had gone through the process of obtaining a valuation on a property they were looking to buy in the last five years.
91% believe that buyers would be better protected if compulsory regulation were introduced.
While all sales agents are legally bound to offer a customer redress scheme, those who are not members of a professional body are not obliged to meet minimum competency standards or subject to the scrutiny of regulatory monitoring.
Only agents who belong to a regulated professional body are duty bound to a strict ethical code and obliged meet minimum competency levels.
For example, if RICS agents fail to act in accordance with rules of conduct, they are subject to regulatory investigation and if found to have acted inappropriately are subject to sanctions. In extreme cases, agents can potentially lose their chartered status.
RICS would like to see all estate agents forced to sign up to a professional regulation scheme that provides better safeguards for buyers and sellers and is clearer than the current regulatory regime which is unnecessarily complex. Concise, compulsory regulation would both improve consumer protection and minimise the burden on business by simplifying legislation, making it easier for agents to abide by.
“These results show a shocking lack of consumer trust in the estate agency profession,” said Peter Bolton King, RICS global residential director.
“Clearly, when people are making the biggest purchase of their lives, they want to know that they can trust their agent and the advice they’re given. People who are buying or selling a house should always check that their agent is a regulated member of a professional body, such as RICS, who abide by ethical codes.
“By using an unregulated estate agent, people are potentially dealing with someone who doesn’t understand their obligations to consumers. Although all estate agents must have a redress scheme, these only deal with complaints once something has gone wrong. This is like closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. What is needed is compulsory regulation for all agents that helps to raise standards and prevent problems from occurring in the first place.”
Tell us something we don't know!
In a world of regulation, how on earth has this been allowed to slip through the net.
The ethics of some of theses people have caused heart ache and financial loss. Regulation is a must to move the business forward in the manner the end user requires.
Get rid of no-sale no fee, as thats so easily abused.
Whers the 1% worold for this business? If the average house is worth just under £200,000, please don't tell me that estate agents could not work and bee profitable on 1% of that?
1% world would get rid of the cowboys over night, leaving teh more ethical agents to operate a correctly regulated business that they could still make a profit from.
Fix thisd massive flaw now!