Information disclosure not enough for consumer protection

Published on

Kay Blair

The Financial Services Consumer Panel has warned that disclosure is not enough to guarantee consumer protection.

Speaking at EIOPA’s second Consumer Strategy day in Frankfurt, Kay Blair, vice chair of the FSA Consumer Panel, has warned against over-reliance on information disclosure to protect consumers.

The Panel believes the new key information document (KID) has potential to change the way financial services products are communicated. However, it believes the KID should only be regarded as one part of the framework necessary to protect consumers. Complex products and aggressive and misleading industry sales tactics mean that more must be done, it says.

Blair (pictured) said: “The problem with financial services is that there is a fundamentally unequal relationship. Products are sold by highly knowledgeable providers to consumers who often lack an understanding of the full nature of the product they are buying.

“Although the concept of a document which allows comparison between products with similar outcomes is welcome, it is difficult to see how a single document can bridge the information gap.

“The interests of advisers, providers, and their customers must be aligned with appropriate remuneration structures. The Panel has strongly welcomed the MiFID principle that providers must act, honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of their customers.

“Additionally, consumers need access to straightforward outcome products that are easy to understand and have expected outcomes. Unfortunately, financial services providers are adept at developing complex products with unclear or confusing outcomes.

“Within a context of appropriate remuneration and straightforward products, the KID has the potential to strengthen consumer protection, particularly if it is part of a much wider, more meaningful communications strategy. The KID should allow potential customers to compare both products with similar outcomes and those from different providers.

“However, the format of the document must be rigorously tested and the assumptions on which it is based must be clear and understandable if it is to achieve its objectives. It must also take account of the fact that we live in a digital age where people are used to receiving information in a different format.”

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

Latest articles

Chancellor presses lenders to expand support for borrowers ahead of rate resets

The government has secured fresh commitments from major lenders to step up engagement with...

Suffolk BS tops £800m in mortgage assets after strong 2025 growth

Suffolk Building Society has passed £800m of mortgage assets for the first time after...

UTB eases mortgage and second charge processes with criteria changes

United Trust Bank (UTB) has introduced a series of service and criteria changes across...

Foundation returns with revised buy-to-let and residential mortgage range

Foundation has returned to the market with a revised product range across both buy-to-let...

The Buckinghamshire launches new discounted rate range

Buckinghamshire Building Society has launched a new discounted rate mortgage range, giving brokers greater...

Latest publication

Other news

Chancellor presses lenders to expand support for borrowers ahead of rate resets

The government has secured fresh commitments from major lenders to step up engagement with...

Suffolk BS tops £800m in mortgage assets after strong 2025 growth

Suffolk Building Society has passed £800m of mortgage assets for the first time after...

UTB eases mortgage and second charge processes with criteria changes

United Trust Bank (UTB) has introduced a series of service and criteria changes across...