Information disclosure not enough for consumer protection

Published on

Kay Blair

The Financial Services Consumer Panel has warned that disclosure is not enough to guarantee consumer protection.

Speaking at EIOPA’s second Consumer Strategy day in Frankfurt, Kay Blair, vice chair of the FSA Consumer Panel, has warned against over-reliance on information disclosure to protect consumers.

The Panel believes the new key information document (KID) has potential to change the way financial services products are communicated. However, it believes the KID should only be regarded as one part of the framework necessary to protect consumers. Complex products and aggressive and misleading industry sales tactics mean that more must be done, it says.

Blair (pictured) said: “The problem with financial services is that there is a fundamentally unequal relationship. Products are sold by highly knowledgeable providers to consumers who often lack an understanding of the full nature of the product they are buying.

“Although the concept of a document which allows comparison between products with similar outcomes is welcome, it is difficult to see how a single document can bridge the information gap.

“The interests of advisers, providers, and their customers must be aligned with appropriate remuneration structures. The Panel has strongly welcomed the MiFID principle that providers must act, honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of their customers.

“Additionally, consumers need access to straightforward outcome products that are easy to understand and have expected outcomes. Unfortunately, financial services providers are adept at developing complex products with unclear or confusing outcomes.

“Within a context of appropriate remuneration and straightforward products, the KID has the potential to strengthen consumer protection, particularly if it is part of a much wider, more meaningful communications strategy. The KID should allow potential customers to compare both products with similar outcomes and those from different providers.

“However, the format of the document must be rigorously tested and the assumptions on which it is based must be clear and understandable if it is to achieve its objectives. It must also take account of the fact that we live in a digital age where people are used to receiving information in a different format.”

Latest POLL

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

Latest articles

Square 1 Media announces May Mortgage Market Debate

Square 1 Media is to hold its next Mortgage Market Debate on Wednesday, 21 May,...

Coventry BS maintains status as one of the best workplaces

Coventry Building Society has been named one of Great Place to Work's UK’s Best...

Atom bank breaks Near Prime record

Atom bank has reported another record-breaking month for Near Prime activity. Over the course of...

Berkeley Alexander appoints new BDM

General insurance provider Berkeley Alexander has announced the appointment of Grant Robinson as a...

Other news

Lenders must step up on high LTV products

Things are on the up for borrowers with a smaller deposit. The financial information...

Square 1 Media announces May Mortgage Market Debate

Square 1 Media is to hold its next Mortgage Market Debate on Wednesday, 21 May,...

Coventry BS maintains status as one of the best workplaces

Coventry Building Society has been named one of Great Place to Work's UK’s Best...