Firm rapped for misleading conveyancing quote

Published on

Bury-based ABT Law LLP has had an advert banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).

The website www.evolvedconveyancing.co.uk, promoting conveyancing services, contained an online quote tool. The tool returned a quote of £390.80 when a £125,000 purchase price with no mortgage was entered.

The complainant challenged whether the online quote was misleading, because his final bill was significantly more.

ABT Law did not respond to the ASA’s enquiries.

The ASA was concerned by ABT Law’s lack of substantive response and apparent disregard for the Code, which was a breach of CAP Code clause 1.7 (Unreasonable delay). It reminded them of their responsibility to provide a substantive response to its enquiries and told them to do so in future.

The ad watchdog noted that the complainant had received an online quote for £390.80 for conveyancing services but understood he had been charged significantly more. Because the ASA had not received any substantiation from ABT Law to demonstrate that their quotes were accurate, it concluded that the online quote was misleading.

The ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 1.7 (Unreasonable delay), 3.1 and 3.3 (Misleading advertising), 3.7 (Substantiation) and 3.17 (Prices).

The ASA ruled that the ad must not appear again in its current form and it referred the matter to CAP’s Compliance team.

Latest POLL

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

1 COMMENT

  1. This is all too common with many solicitors quoting only the conveyancing fee they charge and regularly ignoring VAT and disbursements, which makes it difficult for customers to compare costs.

    Ironically, I read a letter in the trade press from an IFA last month that said "RDR would make IFAs truly professional like solicitors and accountants". Personally, I believe we are well ahead of their standards with a more rigorous regime that has been in place and tweaked for overn 20 years.

    Financial adviers have file checking, observations, CPD, annual testing, separate formal qualifications for each field, an independent ombudsmen, transparency/public censure and explicit remuneration statements, but the Law Society and SRA have only relatively introduced some of these. Before then, once a solicitor had completed their initial training, they were comparatively unchecked thereon for life.

Comments are closed.

Latest articles

Berkeley Alexander appoints new BDM

General insurance provider Berkeley Alexander has announced the appointment of Grant Robinson as a...

Newcastle for Intermediaries adds three-year fix range to mortgage offering

Newcastle for Intermediaries has introduced a new range of three-year fixed rate products. It said...

Mortgage product availability surpasses 25,000 for the first time

The number of mortgage products available in the UK has reached an all-time high,...

ASG Finance launches loan for HNW investors

ASG Finance has introduced its latest funding initiative: the ‘Base Rate Beater’ secured investment...

Other news

Why it matters that bridging hit more than £10bn last year

We see many numbers bandied around in the financial industry, which can sometimes have...

Berkeley Alexander appoints new BDM

General insurance provider Berkeley Alexander has announced the appointment of Grant Robinson as a...

Newcastle for Intermediaries adds three-year fix range to mortgage offering

Newcastle for Intermediaries has introduced a new range of three-year fixed rate products. It said...