Which? exposes failings with certain claims management firms

Published on

Some claims management companies are discouraging consumers from claiming back excessive bank charges or mis-sold payment protection insurance (PPI) by themselves, according to an undercover investigation carried out by consumer magazine Which?.

In August 2009, Which? made 68 calls to claims management companies posing as potential customers. 38 of the calls were about PPI and 30 were about bank charges.

Researchers who posed as customers interested in making a claim found that almost a third of firms didn’t meet Which? benchmarks.

To pass the Which? benchmark, companies had to tell the Which? undercover researcher that they could pursue the claim themselves and not suggest that they would have a more favourable outcome if they opted to use the claims management companies. They also had to be clear and honest about success rates, how they charged fees and who the company was regulated by.

Only 10 out of 38 companies asked about mis-sold PPI passed the Which? test. 12 of those that failed implied the researchers would be better off using their company rather than claiming independently, even though an independent claim costs nothing. This breaks rules set by the Ministry of Justice (MOJ). The rules state that where a claim is one that falls within the province of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, the Financial Ombudsman Service, the Housing Ombudsman Service or any other recognised dispute resolution procedure, the business must not suggest that a claimant will have a more favourable outcome if he uses the services of the business.

Which? used a combination of the Ministry of Justice rules and its own standards to check whether firms were acting fairly and reasonably, ensuring that information wasn’t misleading and advising clients of the ombudsman scheme.

A further 16 firms professed to have successfully claimed back money in 90% or more of cases without properly qualifying this, while five companies couldn’t say how they were regulated.

Advice about excessive bank charges claims was better, though some firms discouraged researchers from claiming themselves. Comments included: “You can make the claim yourself but you will have to wait till maybe next year… [we can do it] straight away””. One company didn’t mention the ongoing bank charges court case.

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

Latest articles

The Coventry trims mortgage rates after Bank cut

Coventry for intermediaries is cutting mortgage rates across its residential and buy-to-let ranges, with...

Atom bank backs UK’s only zip maker with £950k loan

Atom bank has provided a commercial mortgage of more than £950,000 to Zipex, the...

Redwood strengthens North East presence with senior promotion

Redwood Bank has strengthened its position in the North East with the promotion of...

StreamBank backs £584,500 London commercial refurbishment

StreamBank has completed a £584,500 bridging loan to refinance a London warehouse and fund...

Tim Miller appointed chief operating officer at Stonebridge

Stonebridge has named Tim Miller, former chief operating officer for APAC at Bluestone, to...

Latest publication

Latest opinions

Could a move to ‘enhanced advice’ also mean mandatory protection conversations?

The FCA’s recent Mortgage Market Discussion Paper (DP25/2) has got the industry talking about...

Take off the rose-tinted glasses and stop chasing a rate cut

Every six weeks the financial world raises its eyebrows at the prospect of a...

Job cuts to inflation shock: preparing for a mortgage arrears crisis

The latest data on jobs paints a picture of a rapidly weakening labour market. The...

URGENT! AI Is coming for you. Or maybe not…

I’ll try to make this as straight to the point as I can. The...

Other news

The Coventry trims mortgage rates after Bank cut

Coventry for intermediaries is cutting mortgage rates across its residential and buy-to-let ranges, with...

Atom bank backs UK’s only zip maker with £950k loan

Atom bank has provided a commercial mortgage of more than £950,000 to Zipex, the...

Redwood strengthens North East presence with senior promotion

Redwood Bank has strengthened its position in the North East with the promotion of...