Online estate agent’s ads declared misleading

Published on

A website and TV ad for HouseSimple, an online estate agent, have been criticised by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for making unsubstantiated claims.

The website, seen in February 2017, stated on its “Estate Agent Fees explained” page that “High street estate agent fees are usually worked out as a percentage of the final sale price of your property. This can range from 1.5% to 4% (plus 20% VAT – which often isn’t clearly highlighted as an extra cost), adding up to an average bill of £5,247” and that online estate agents were “much cheaper”.

A TV ad, seen on 14 March 2017, stated in the voice-over that “Get an expert evaluation, professional photos and floor plans … just like a traditional estate agent … but the big difference, HouseSimple customers saved on average £5,000 in fees.” Text at the bottom of the screen stated “Based on responses of 391 previous HouseSimple customers surveyed.”

The ASA received two complaints. One complainant, who believed that the average estate agent fee was 1.3%, challenged whether the claim “1.5% to 4%” in the website ad was misleading and could be substantiated. Both complainants challenged whether the savings claims in both ads were misleading and could be substantiated.

The ad watchdog concluded that the claim that high street estate agent fees ranged “from 1.5% to 4%” (plus VAT) was misleading and had not been substantiated. On this point the ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.7 (Substantiation) and 3.33 (Comparisons with identifiable competitors).

In addition, the ASA concluded that the savings claims in both ads misleading and had not been substantiated.

On this point, the website ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.7 (Substantiation) and 3.33 (Comparisons with identifiable competitors) and ad (b) breached BCAP Code rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.9 (Substantiation) and 3.33 (Comparisons with identifiable competitors).

The ads should not appear again in their current form. The ASA told HouseSimple Ltd to ensure that ads which made comparisons provided sufficient information about the services being compared to ensure that consumers would not be misled about either the advertised service or the competing service. The ASA also told them to ensure they held adequate evidence to substantiate the basis of comparative claims.

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

Latest articles

Millions unclear on cost of credit as gaps in financial understanding persist

Millions of UK adults are using credit without fully understanding borrowing costs or how...

UK house price growth slows as London slips into decline

HM Land Registry’s latest UK House Price Index shows the average property price across...

FCA to extend conduct rules to cover bullying and harassment

Mortgage brokers, lenders and other regulated firms will have to tighten their internal conduct...

Solar and heat pump rules could push up mortgage prices

New rules forcing developers to install solar panels and low-carbon heating systems on most...

Keystone launches two-year tracker range as brokers seek flexibility in volatile market

Keystone Property Finance has launched a new range of two-year tracker products for brokers,...

Latest publication

Other news

Millions unclear on cost of credit as gaps in financial understanding persist

Millions of UK adults are using credit without fully understanding borrowing costs or how...

Supply side continues to drive the change agenda

Regulatory change is no longer something firms respond to periodically. It is now a...

Searching for sunny uplands

There is a growing sense, shared quietly in boardrooms and rather less quietly over...