Expo: FSA not looking to ban interest-only

Published on

Financial Services Authority

The FSA has explicitly stated it has no intention of banning interest-only mortgage products.

In a seminar session dominated by the interest-only issue at yesterday’s Mortgage Business Expo in Manchester, Lynda Blackwell of the FSA said the regulator would not be using the MMR to ban the products neither did it intend to “be prescriptive about the type of repayment vehicle” lenders could or couldn’t accept.

She also revealed that a number of lenders actively wanted interest-only banned.

She said: “Some lenders would have liked us to ban interest-only. Our view is that interest-only is suitable for certain borrowers. We’ve said to lenders that we want you to make an informed judgement.”

Blackwell also said that some lender reactions to the FSA’s thinking in this area had changed recently when they revealed the responsibility would be placed in their hands: “The lenders who said they didn’t want prescription, suddenly when it was over to them, said they now wanted prescription.”

In terms of when a lender would be required to review a borrower’s repayment vehicle to ascertain whether it was on track to pay off the capital, Blackwell said the FSA had gone against some of the advice it had received from consumer groups. She said that lenders would “at least once during the term of the interest-only mortgage” need to go out and check that the repayment vehicle was “on track”.

On the issue of whether property sale as a means of repaying the interest-only mortgage were to be banned, she said no but she did say that lenders would need to consider it as a method of repayment “very carefully”.

Responding to Blackwell, James Chidgey of Nationwide, voiced concern about how lenders’ actions, in relation to interest-only, would be viewed much further down the line.

He said: “10 or 20 years down the line where would the Ombudsman and the claims management firms be on this? Prudently we might want to review [the repayment vehicle] more than once. [However] where a customer sees us reviewing their repayment vehicle they may believe we are responsible for it.”

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

Latest articles

The Coventry cuts selected intermediary residential fixed rates

Coventry for intermediaries has reduced a number of residential fixed-rate products for new and...

Mortgage Advice Bureau completes acquisition of Dashly

Mortgage Advice Bureau (MAB) has completed the acquisition of technology and data company Dashly,...

The Buckinghamshire lowers rates across key ranges

Buckinghamshire Building Society has cut rates across a wide spread of residential and buy-to-let...

FCA finds protection market delivering good outcomes, says TPFG

The Property Franchise Group PLC (TPFG) has responded to the publication of the Financial...

Conditional selling remains industry flashpoint as enforcement lags

Conditional selling remains one of the most persistent and contentious issues facing the UK...

Latest publication

Other news

The Coventry cuts selected intermediary residential fixed rates

Coventry for intermediaries has reduced a number of residential fixed-rate products for new and...

Mortgage Advice Bureau completes acquisition of Dashly

Mortgage Advice Bureau (MAB) has completed the acquisition of technology and data company Dashly,...

The Buckinghamshire lowers rates across key ranges

Buckinghamshire Building Society has cut rates across a wide spread of residential and buy-to-let...