Avoid claims firms, Which? urges PPI claimants

Published on

Over £2 billion of PPI redress could be siphoned off by claims management firms, Which? has claimed.

The consumer body says that, with an average payout of £2,750 for mis-sold PPI and claims management firms taking as standard a 25% cut as their fee, consumers could pay £825 each for something they could do themselves.

It also argues that people who claim back PPI sold with a loan could find themselves owing money to their claims management firm, even in the event of a successful claim. If the loan is still being repaid, redress often comes in the form of a reduction of the outstanding balance leaving the consumer to pay the claims management firm’s fee out of their own pocket.

Which? is calling on consumers who think they may have been mis-sold PPI to complain to their bank themselves and has created a free online PPI complaints tool – www.which.co.uk/ppiclaim – to make the process easier.

The consumer body is also urging any consumer whose bank rejects their complaint to go to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), which is independent and free to use.

Which? is calling on banks to drastically improve their complaints handling, reducing the burden on the FOS and the proportion of PPI complaints it upholds in favour of the consumer.

Which? chief executive Peter Vicary-Smith, said: “Anyone who thinks they may have been mis-sold PPI should complain directly to whoever sold it to them. By going to a claims management company, you’ll pay what could be a lot of money for something you can easily do yourself. If your bank rejects your complaint, always go to the Ombudsman – most complaints about PPI are upheld in favour of the consumer.”

Which? has joined forces with Barclays to launch a national public awareness campaign to help consumers avoid the pitfalls of claims management firms and instead use Which?’s free online PPI tool to guide consumers through the complaints process.

Deanna Oppenheimer, chief executive of Barclays UK Retail Banking, said: “We are firmly focussed on resolving complaints from our customers as quickly as we can and we are pleased to partner with Which? in this effort.”

COMMENT ON MORTGAGE SOUP

We want to hear from you!
Leave a comment and get the conversation started.
You need to register to post, so please login or sign up below.

Latest articles

The Coventry cuts selected intermediary residential fixed rates

Coventry for intermediaries has reduced a number of residential fixed-rate products for new and...

Mortgage Advice Bureau completes acquisition of Dashly

Mortgage Advice Bureau (MAB) has completed the acquisition of technology and data company Dashly,...

The Buckinghamshire lowers rates across key ranges

Buckinghamshire Building Society has cut rates across a wide spread of residential and buy-to-let...

FCA finds protection market delivering good outcomes, says TPFG

The Property Franchise Group PLC (TPFG) has responded to the publication of the Financial...

Conditional selling remains industry flashpoint as enforcement lags

Conditional selling remains one of the most persistent and contentious issues facing the UK...

Latest publication

Other news

The Coventry cuts selected intermediary residential fixed rates

Coventry for intermediaries has reduced a number of residential fixed-rate products for new and...

Mortgage Advice Bureau completes acquisition of Dashly

Mortgage Advice Bureau (MAB) has completed the acquisition of technology and data company Dashly,...

The Buckinghamshire lowers rates across key ranges

Buckinghamshire Building Society has cut rates across a wide spread of residential and buy-to-let...